|

ARTICLES
Are autism, vaccines and mercury related?
THE HILL, Wednesday, February 9, 2005
OPED by Rep. Dave Weldon, M.D. (R-FL)
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/020905/ss_weldon.html
In January 2004, the nation’s pediatricians received an autism ALARM [an
acronym for an American Academy of Pediatrics communication program] stating
autism-spectrum disorders (ASD) were affecting 1 in 166 children (90 percent
of them are boys).
This far exceeds the 1 in 3,000 rate of the early 1980s. Last year,
California added 3,074 autistic children to its rolls. Every state has seen
a dramatic increase.
Few Americans understand the magnitude of the human toll and the urgency
with which we must act. Autism impairs an individual’s ability to
communicate with the world. Interventions are costly and have limited
effectiveness. To date there is no known cure, and many children now
affected will ultimately become wards of the state at great costs to
taxpayers.
So far, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other health officials have been
unable to tell us the cause of this dramatic increase in the incidence
of this terrible condition. Part of the reason may be that CDC officials
have been spending most of their time trying to tell us what hasn’t caused
it.
Many parents believe that their children’s autism may be associated with
a vaccine or a mercury-based vaccine additive. Many parents claim their
children were developing normally until they received certain shots. CDC
officials have been quick to dismiss such notions, and they have been slow
and reluctant to investigate this hypothesis. The CDC’s lack of response
undermines public confidence in the CDC and the vaccine program.
I am a strong proponent of childhood vaccines. My children have been
vaccinated. Vaccines protect children from permanent disability and death,
and I consider it critically important that we protect the
integrity of this vital public-health program.
Parental concerns regarding vaccine safety are not totally without merit.
For years, children in America received the diphtheria, pertussis and
tetanus shot at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. This shot contained a
mercury-containing preservative called thimerosal. Then in the late 1980s
and early 1990s, two additional mercury-containing injections were added to
the schedule.
Apparently, no one at the National Immunization Program (NIP) within CDC
did the calculations regarding the cumulative mercury exposure. The net
effect of this was that, in the 1990s, babies in America were exposed to
mercury by injection at levels not considered safe by the Environmental
Protection Agency for oral consumption by adults. Children, with their
rapidly developing nervous systems, are considered much more vulnerable to
mercury’s toxic effects.
NIP leaders have attempted to allay public concern about mercury by
commissioning an Institute of Medicine report. This report received much
press attention when its results seemed to conclude that there was no link
between mercury and autism.
However, careful review of this report shows that it is based almost
exclusively on European data, where children were exposed to substantially
lower levels of mercury, raising serious questions about its validity.
Fortunately, NIP officials did have the presence of mind in 1999 to begin
removing mercury from most of the routine vaccines. If mercury is
implicated, we should begin to see autism incidences declining in the
years ahead as infants born today are no longer exposed to these high
levels of mercury.
Other parents have suggested that their children’s autism followed
shortly after their measles, mumps and rubella vaccinations — given at about
15 months of age. Their children appeared to be developing
normally until after the vaccination, when their children lost skills and
deteriorated.
Several investigators have found measles present in the inflamed
intestines of children with autism. Others have discovered evidence of
measles particles in the spinal fluid of these children. Why is it
there? What effect is it having on the children? Is it there because the
children have autism or is it contributing to autism? We simply don’t know,
but we must investigate.
As a clinician and a strong supporter of the tremendous benefits of
vaccinations, I believe it is important to listen to the concerns of the
parents of these autistic children and do the necessary research to
answer these questions. I commend federal officials for removing mercury
from most childhood vaccines. Unfortunately it remains in the childhood flu
vaccine, and I will again introduce legislation to eliminate mercury from
this vaccine.
It’s time for a new day of aggressive research to make vaccines safer for
everyone, to understand fully what effects small amounts of mercury may have
on infants and to develop better measures to screen-out children at risk for
an adverse vaccine reaction. The NIH and CDC have been slow to respond to
this crisis, and it is time for Congress to act more assertively.
Weldon, a physician, is a member of the Appropriations Labor, Health
and Human Services and Education Subcommittee.
|
Mercury/vaccine bill would provide 'firewall protection'
CRAIG WESTOVER
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Posted on Wed, Feb. 09, 2005
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/editorial/10849069.htm
What do you say to the father of an autistic child?
What do you say to the father of a child who passed all her baby milestones
on time . and who then helplessly watched the child he loved regress into a
self-absorbed shell?
What do you say when that father lashes out at drug companies and
politicians for "poisoning for profit" his little girl with vaccines laced
with thimerosal - a mercury-based additive intended to prevent vaccine
contamination?
What do you say to the father of an autistic child when you think he's
wrong?
That was my reaction to a phone call I received after my column on the flu
vaccine shortage appeared on these pages. I'm old enough to remember
classmates with limbs shriveled by childhood polio. The childhood
vaccination program is a real and proper government success story. Doubting
the conspiracy theory, I was nonetheless curious.
And indeed, curiosity-driven but cursory research turned up "no evidence of
harm" from thimerosal and the trace amounts of mercury found in vaccines.
But it also unearthed annoying bits of data that just didn't fit where my
skeptical attitude wanted to push them.
Autism is a neurological disorder. It affects a child's ability to
communicate, form relationships and respond to his surroundings. There is
clearly a genetic predisposition for autism, but expanding scientific
evidence admits the plausibility of environmental influence. And classical
manifestations of autism are mirrored by behavioral and biological
characteristics of mercury poisoning. Mercury is a known neurotoxin.
Consider: Before 1980 the historical rate of diagnosed autism was four to
five cases for every 10,000 live births. In 2002, the National Institutes of
Health revised that figure to one case for every 250 births. Current figures
peg the ratio at one case in every 150 births.
Then consider this: Over that same time frame, as new vaccines were mandated
by legislation and government regulation, the amount of mercury injected
into some babies nearly tripled. By 1999, a baby who received all
recommended vaccines at his two-month checkup might be injected with 118
times the EPA safe dosage average for a single day.
Put another way, in order to reach a safe dosage level for the mercury
contained in the single Hepatitis B shot mandated for all infants, a baby
would need to weigh 275 pounds.
These data are significant because a bill (S.F. 639) is currently before the
Minnesota Senate Health and Family Security Committee that would prohibit
vaccines that contain mercury from being administered in Minnesota unless
there are exceptional circumstances. It faces an uphill climb.
It would be reassuring if this legislation were inspired by one of the
myriad federal agencies charged with protecting Americans from dangerous
drugs. It was not. How about the Minnesota Health Department? It opposes the
legislation. The Mayo Clinic?
"There are no data to support the theory that thimerosal causes
developmental disorders, such as autism," reads a January 2005 letter to the
HSF Committee from the clinic. "To imply it does misleads the public."
What gives?
In Minnesota and across the nation, it's pushed by parents, united by the
common desire to know what happened to their kids and why, teamed with
independent researchers who have uncovered the connections among vaccine
schedules, mercury exposure and autism.
While the government remained silent, these passionate parents have exposed
flaws in the nation's vaccination program that might have damaged thousands
of children and created financial liabilities and confidence issues that
threaten a program that ought to represent government at its best.
Alarmist? Three months ago, I'd have said, "Absolutely." Today, I think the
word "alarmist" is too tepid.
S.F. 639 is an important bill because, as its supporters say, it builds a
protective firewall between Minnesotans and a federal and state bureaucracy
reluctant to investigate its own performance and admit to and correct its
own mistakes.
A newspaper column can, at best, elevate the visibility of the S.F. 639, but
can only scratch the surface of this scientific, political and emotional
issue. I will be devoting additional columns to the topic regardless of the
fate of S.F. 639.
The autism epidemic - and it is an epidemic - doesn't go away if S.F. 639
fails to become law. It doesn't go away because bureaucrats won't
acknowledge good science that indicates there might be a problem. And it
certainly doesn't go away just because bureaucrats don't know what to say to
the father of an autistic child.
Westover is an Afton writer who blogs at www.craig westover.blogspot.com,
where you can read more about mercury and autism. E-mail him at
westover4@yahoo.com.
|
'91 Memo Warned of Mercury in Shots
By Myron Levin for the LA Times. [This story has been picked up widely all
over the country.]
February 8, 05
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-vaccine8feb08,0,624328.story?coll=la-home-headlines
A memo from Merck & Co. shows that, nearly a decade before the first public
disclosure, senior executives were concerned that infants were getting an
elevated dose of mercury in vaccinations containing a widely used
sterilizing agent.
The March 1991 memo, obtained by The Times, said that 6-month-old
children who received their shots on schedule would get a mercury dose up to
87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum daily consumption of mercury
from fish.
"When viewed in this way, the mercury load appears rather large,"
said the memo from Dr. Maurice R. Hilleman, an internationally renowned
vaccinologist. It was written to the president of Merck's vaccine
division.
The memo was prepared at a time when U.S. health authorities were
aggressively expanding their immunization schedule by adding five new shots
for children in their first six months. Many of these shots, as well as some
previously included on the vaccine schedule, contained thimerosal, an
antibacterial compound that is nearly 50% ethyl mercury, a neurotoxin.
Federal health officials disclosed for the first time in 1999 that
many infants were being exposed to mercury above health guidelines through
routine vaccinations. The announcement followed a review by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration that was described at the time as a first effort to
assess the cumulative mercury dose.
But the Merck memo shows that at least one major manufacturer was
aware of the concern much earlier.
"The key issue is whether thimerosal, in the amount given with the
vaccine, does or does not constitute a safety hazard," the memo said.
"However, perception of hazard may be equally important."
Merck officials would not discuss the contents of the memo, citing
pending litigation.
Separately, the drug giant is trying to fend off a legal onslaught
over Vioxx, the popular painkiller it introduced in 1999. The company, based
in Whitehouse Station, N.J., faces hundreds of lawsuits claiming that the
drug caused heart problems and that Merck concealed the risks. Merck, which
in September pulled Vioxx off the market, has denied the allegations.
The legacy of thimerosal, meanwhile, also is causing problems for
Merck and other drug companies.
More than 4,200 claims have been filed in a special federal tribunal,
the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, by parents asserting that their
children suffered autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders from mercury
in vaccines. A handful of similar claims are awaiting trial in civil courts.
The plaintiffs cite various scientific studies that they say prove the
dangers of thimerosal, including at the levels found in vaccines.
Thimerosal has been largely removed from pediatric vaccines in recent
years in what health officials have described as a precautionary measure.
(This has been accomplished as drug makers have voluntarily switched from
multi-dose vials of vaccine, which require a chemical preservative like
thimerosal, to single-dose containers.) In September, Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger signed legislation prohibiting vaccines with more than trace
amounts of thimerosal from being given to babies and pregnant women. Iowa
has a similar ban.
For their part, Merck and other vaccine makers, along with many
government health officials and scientists, say there is no credible
evidence of harm from the amounts of mercury once widely present in kids'
shots. They cite a report in May by a committee of the national Institute of
Medicine concluding that the evidence "favors rejection of a causal
relationship" between vaccines and autism.
The seven-page Merck memo was provided to The Times by James A.
Moody, a Washington lawyer who works with parent groups on vaccine safety
issues. He said he obtained it from a whistle-blower whom he would not name.
The memo provides the "first hard evidence that the companies knew -
or at least Merck knew - that the children were getting significantly more
mercury" than the generally accepted dose, the lawyer said.
He also provided a copy to attorneys for Vera Easter, a Texas woman
who blames thimerosal for the condition of her 7-year-old son, Jordan, who
is autistic and mentally retarded. The Easter lawsuit is pending in U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The defendants include
Merck; rival vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis Pasteur Inc. and Wyeth;
and thimerosal developer Eli Lilly & Co.
Easter's lawyer, Andy Waters, described the memo as "incredibly
damning and incredibly significant." After receiving it in the fall, he
confronted Merck lawyers about why he hadn't seen it earlier.
In a letter to Waters in October, Merck attorneys said they had in
fact made available 32 boxes of records, but that the copying service hired
by the plaintiffs for some reason had failed to copy several of the boxes -
including the one with the Hilleman memo.
"The memo," said company spokeswoman Mary Elizabeth Blake, "was
produced voluntarily by Merck in the ordinary course of discovery
proceedings."
Hilleman is a former senior vice president of Merck who developed
numerous vaccines for the company. A 1999 profile in the Philadelphia
Inquirer said that "it is no exaggeration to assert, as many scientists do,
that Maurice Hilleman has saved more lives than any other living scientist."
Hilleman, 85, currently director of the Merck Institute for
Vaccinology, had officially retired and was a consultant to Merck when he
wrote the '91 memo. He declined to be interviewed.
The memo was sent to Dr. Gordon Douglas, then head of Merck's vaccine
division and now a consultant for the Vaccine Research Center at the
National Institutes of Health. Douglas also declined to comment.
The memo stated that regulators in several countries had raised
concerns about thimerosal, including in Sweden, where the chemical was being
removed from vaccines.
"The public awareness has been raised by the sequential wave of
experiences in Sweden including mercury exposure from additives, fish,
contaminated air, bird deaths from eating mercury-treated seed grains,dental
amalgam leakage, mercury allergy, etc.," the memo said.
It noted that Sweden had set a daily maximum allowance of mercury
from fish of 30 micrograms for a 160-pound adult, roughly the same guideline
used by the FDA. Adjusting for the body weight of infants, Hilleman
calculated that babies who received their shots on schedule could get 87
times the
mercury allowance.
The Swedish and FDA guidelines work out to about four-tenths of a
microgram of mercury per kilogram of body weight. A stricter standard of
one-tenth of a microgram per kilogram has been adopted by the Environmental
Protection Agency and endorsed by the National Research Council.
These standards are based on methyl mercury, the type found in fish
and airborne emissions from power plants. Though toxic, the ethyl mercury in
thimerosal may be less hazardous than methyl mercury, some scientists say,
because it is more quickly purged from the body.
"It appears essentially impossible, based on current information, to
ascertain whether thimerosal in vaccines constitutes or does not constitute
a significant addition to the normal daily input of mercury from diverse
sources," the memo said.
"It is reasonable to conclude" that it should be eliminated where
possible, he said, "especially where use in infants and young children is
anticipated."
In the U.S., however, thimerosal continued to be added throughout the
'90s to a number of widely used pediatric vaccines for hepatitis B,
bacterial meningitis, diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus.
It was added to multi-dose vials of vaccine to prevent contamination
from repeated insertion of needles to extract the medicine. It was not
needed in single-dose vials, but most doctors and clinics preferred to order
vaccine in multi-dose containers because of the lower cost and easier
storage.
The Hilleman memo said that unlike regulators in Sweden and some
other countries, "the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not have this
concern for thimerosal."
A turning point came in 1997 when Congress passed a bill ordering an
FDA review of mercury ingredients in food and drugs.
Completed in 1999, the review revealed the high level of mercury
exposure from pediatric vaccines and raised a furor. In e-mails later
released at a congressional hearing, an FDA official said health
authorities could be criticized for "being 'asleep at the switch' for
decades by allowing a potentially hazardous compound to remain in many
childhood vaccines, and not forcing manufacturers to exclude it from new
products."
It would not have taken "rocket science" to add up the amount of
exposure as the prescribed number of shots was increasing, one of the
e-mails said.
While asserting that there was no proof of harm, the U.S. Public
Health Service in July 1999 called on manufacturers to go mercury-free by
switching to single-dose vials. Soon after, Merck introduced a
mercury-free version of its hepatitis B vaccine, replacing the only
thimerosal-containing vaccine it was still marketing at the time, a company
spokesman said.
By 2002, thimerosal had been eliminated or reduced to trace levels in
nearly all childhood vaccines. One exception is the pediatric flu vaccine
made by Aventis and still sold mainly in multi-dose vials.
|

|