STATES MERCURY BAN


Home How To in Your State Legislator Packet Legislative Text Press Releases Dental Ban Articles

ARTICLES


Are autism, vaccines and mercury related?
THE HILL, Wednesday, February 9, 2005
OPED by Rep. Dave Weldon, M.D. (R-FL)

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/020905/ss_weldon.html 

In January 2004, the nation’s pediatricians received an autism ALARM [an acronym for an American Academy of Pediatrics communication program] stating autism-spectrum disorders (ASD) were affecting 1 in 166 children (90 percent of them are boys).

This far exceeds the 1 in 3,000 rate of the early 1980s. Last year, California added 3,074 autistic children to its rolls. Every state has seen a dramatic increase.

Few Americans understand the magnitude of the human toll and the urgency with which we must act. Autism impairs an individual’s ability to communicate with the world. Interventions are costly and have limited effectiveness. To date there is no known cure, and many children now affected will ultimately become wards of the state at great costs to taxpayers.

So far, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other health officials have been unable to tell us the cause of this dramatic increase in the incidence

of this terrible condition. Part of the reason may be that CDC officials have been spending most of their time trying to tell us what hasn’t caused it.

Many parents believe that their children’s autism may be associated with a vaccine or a mercury-based vaccine additive. Many parents claim their children were developing normally until they received certain shots. CDC officials have been quick to dismiss such notions, and they have been slow and reluctant to investigate this hypothesis. The CDC’s lack of response undermines public confidence in the CDC and the vaccine program.

I am a strong proponent of childhood vaccines. My children have been vaccinated. Vaccines protect children from permanent disability and death, and I consider it critically important that we protect the

integrity of this vital public-health program.

Parental concerns regarding vaccine safety are not totally without merit. For years, children in America received the diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus shot at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. This shot contained a

mercury-containing preservative called thimerosal. Then in the late 1980s and early 1990s, two additional mercury-containing injections were added to the schedule.

Apparently, no one at the National Immunization Program (NIP) within CDC did the calculations regarding the cumulative mercury exposure. The net effect of this was that, in the 1990s, babies in America were exposed to mercury by injection at levels not considered safe by the Environmental

Protection Agency for oral consumption by adults. Children, with their rapidly developing nervous systems, are considered much more vulnerable to mercury’s toxic effects.

NIP leaders have attempted to allay public concern about mercury by commissioning an Institute of Medicine report. This report received much press attention when its results seemed to conclude that there was no link between mercury and autism.

However, careful review of this report shows that it is based almost exclusively on European data, where children were exposed to substantially lower levels of mercury, raising serious questions about its validity.

Fortunately, NIP officials did have the presence of mind in 1999 to begin removing mercury from most of the routine vaccines. If mercury is implicated, we should begin to see autism incidences declining in the

years ahead as infants born today are no longer exposed to these high levels of mercury.

Other parents have suggested that their children’s autism followed shortly after their measles, mumps and rubella vaccinations — given at about 15 months of age. Their children appeared to be developing

normally until after the vaccination, when their children lost skills and deteriorated.

Several investigators have found measles present in the inflamed intestines of children with autism. Others have discovered evidence of measles particles in the spinal fluid of these children. Why is it

there? What effect is it having on the children? Is it there because the children have autism or is it contributing to autism? We simply don’t know, but we must investigate.

As a clinician and a strong supporter of the tremendous benefits of vaccinations, I believe it is important to listen to the concerns of the parents of these autistic children and do the necessary research to

answer these questions. I commend federal officials for removing mercury from most childhood vaccines. Unfortunately it remains in the childhood flu vaccine, and I will again introduce legislation to eliminate mercury from this vaccine.

It’s time for a new day of aggressive research to make vaccines safer for everyone, to understand fully what effects small amounts of mercury may have on infants and to develop better measures to screen-out children at risk for an adverse vaccine reaction. The NIH and CDC have been slow to respond to this crisis, and it is time for Congress to act more assertively.

Weldon, a physician, is a member of the Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Subcommittee.

 


Mercury/vaccine bill would provide 'firewall protection'

CRAIG WESTOVER
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Posted on Wed, Feb. 09, 2005
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/editorial/10849069.htm

What do you say to the father of an autistic child?

What do you say to the father of a child who passed all her baby milestones on time . and who then helplessly watched the child he loved regress into a self-absorbed shell?

What do you say when that father lashes out at drug companies and politicians for "poisoning for profit" his little girl with vaccines laced with thimerosal - a mercury-based additive intended to prevent vaccine contamination?

What do you say to the father of an autistic child when you think he's wrong?

That was my reaction to a phone call I received after my column on the flu vaccine shortage appeared on these pages. I'm old enough to remember classmates with limbs shriveled by childhood polio. The childhood vaccination program is a real and proper government success story. Doubting the conspiracy theory, I was nonetheless curious.

And indeed, curiosity-driven but cursory research turned up "no evidence of harm" from thimerosal and the trace amounts of mercury found in vaccines. But it also unearthed annoying bits of data that just didn't fit where my skeptical attitude wanted to push them.

Autism is a neurological disorder. It affects a child's ability to communicate, form relationships and respond to his surroundings. There is clearly a genetic predisposition for autism, but expanding scientific evidence admits the plausibility of environmental influence. And classical manifestations of autism are mirrored by behavioral and biological characteristics of mercury poisoning. Mercury is a known neurotoxin.

Consider: Before 1980 the historical rate of diagnosed autism was four to five cases for every 10,000 live births. In 2002, the National Institutes of Health revised that figure to one case for every 250 births. Current figures peg the ratio at one case in every 150 births.

Then consider this: Over that same time frame, as new vaccines were mandated by legislation and government regulation, the amount of mercury injected into some babies nearly tripled. By 1999, a baby who received all recommended vaccines at his two-month checkup might be injected with 118 times the EPA safe dosage average for a single day.

Put another way, in order to reach a safe dosage level for the mercury contained in the single Hepatitis B shot mandated for all infants, a baby would need to weigh 275 pounds.

These data are significant because a bill (S.F. 639) is currently before the Minnesota Senate Health and Family Security Committee that would prohibit vaccines that contain mercury from being administered in Minnesota unless there are exceptional circumstances. It faces an uphill climb.

It would be reassuring if this legislation were inspired by one of the myriad federal agencies charged with protecting Americans from dangerous drugs. It was not. How about the Minnesota Health Department? It opposes the legislation. The Mayo Clinic?

"There are no data to support the theory that thimerosal causes developmental disorders, such as autism," reads a January 2005 letter to the HSF Committee from the clinic. "To imply it does misleads the public."

What gives?

In Minnesota and across the nation, it's pushed by parents, united by the common desire to know what happened to their kids and why, teamed with independent researchers who have uncovered the connections among vaccine schedules, mercury exposure and autism.

While the government remained silent, these passionate parents have exposed flaws in the nation's vaccination program that might have damaged thousands of children and created financial liabilities and confidence issues that threaten a program that ought to represent government at its best.

Alarmist? Three months ago, I'd have said, "Absolutely." Today, I think the word "alarmist" is too tepid.

S.F. 639 is an important bill because, as its supporters say, it builds a protective firewall between Minnesotans and a federal and state bureaucracy reluctant to investigate its own performance and admit to and correct its own mistakes.

A newspaper column can, at best, elevate the visibility of the S.F. 639, but can only scratch the surface of this scientific, political and emotional issue. I will be devoting additional columns to the topic regardless of the fate of S.F. 639.

The autism epidemic - and it is an epidemic - doesn't go away if S.F. 639 fails to become law. It doesn't go away because bureaucrats won't acknowledge good science that indicates there might be a problem. And it certainly doesn't go away just because bureaucrats don't know what to say to the father of an autistic child.

Westover is an Afton writer who blogs at www.craig westover.blogspot.com, where you can read more about mercury and autism. E-mail him at westover4@yahoo.com

 

'91 Memo Warned of Mercury in Shots
By Myron Levin for the LA Times. [This story has been picked up widely all over the country.]
February 8, 05

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-vaccine8feb08,0,624328.story?coll=la-home-headlines

        A memo from Merck & Co. shows that, nearly a decade before the first public disclosure, senior executives were concerned that infants were getting an elevated dose of mercury in vaccinations containing a widely used sterilizing agent.
       The March 1991 memo, obtained by The Times, said that 6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule would get a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish.
       "When viewed in this way, the mercury load appears rather large," said the memo from Dr. Maurice R. Hilleman, an internationally renowned vaccinologist. It was written to the president of Merck's vaccine
division.
       The memo was prepared at a time when U.S. health authorities were aggressively expanding their immunization schedule by adding five new shots for children in their first six months. Many of these shots, as well as some previously included on the vaccine schedule, contained thimerosal, an antibacterial compound that is nearly 50% ethyl mercury, a neurotoxin.
       Federal health officials disclosed for the first time in 1999 that many infants were being exposed to mercury above health guidelines through routine vaccinations. The announcement followed a review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that was described at the time as a first effort to assess the cumulative mercury dose.
       But the Merck memo shows that at least one major manufacturer was aware of the concern much earlier.
       "The key issue is whether thimerosal, in the amount given with the vaccine, does or does not constitute a safety hazard," the memo said. "However, perception of hazard may be equally important."
       Merck officials would not discuss the contents of the memo, citing pending litigation.
       Separately, the drug giant is trying to fend off a legal onslaught over Vioxx, the popular painkiller it introduced in 1999. The company, based in Whitehouse Station, N.J., faces hundreds of lawsuits claiming that the drug caused heart problems and that Merck concealed the risks. Merck, which in September pulled Vioxx off the market, has denied the allegations.
       The legacy of thimerosal, meanwhile, also is causing problems for Merck and other drug companies.
       More than 4,200 claims have been filed in a special federal tribunal, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, by parents asserting that their children suffered autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders from mercury in vaccines. A handful of similar claims are awaiting trial in civil courts. The plaintiffs cite various scientific studies that they say prove the dangers of thimerosal, including at the levels found in vaccines.
       Thimerosal has been largely removed from pediatric vaccines in recent years in what health officials have described as a precautionary measure. (This has been accomplished as drug makers have voluntarily switched from multi-dose vials of vaccine, which require a chemical preservative like thimerosal, to single-dose containers.)  In September, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation prohibiting vaccines with more than trace amounts of thimerosal from being given to babies and pregnant women. Iowa has a similar ban.
       For their part, Merck and other vaccine makers, along with many government health officials and scientists, say there is no credible evidence of harm from the amounts of mercury once widely present in kids' shots. They cite a report in May by a committee of the national Institute of Medicine concluding that the evidence "favors rejection of a causal relationship" between vaccines and autism.
       The seven-page Merck memo was provided to The Times by James A. Moody, a Washington lawyer who works with parent groups on vaccine safety issues. He said he obtained it from a whistle-blower whom he would not name.
       The memo provides the "first hard evidence that the companies knew - or at least Merck knew - that the children were getting significantly more mercury" than the generally accepted dose, the lawyer said.
       He also provided a copy to attorneys for Vera Easter, a Texas woman who blames thimerosal for the condition of her 7-year-old son, Jordan, who is autistic and mentally retarded. The Easter lawsuit is pending in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The defendants include Merck; rival vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis Pasteur Inc. and Wyeth; and thimerosal developer Eli Lilly & Co.
       Easter's lawyer, Andy Waters, described the memo as "incredibly damning and incredibly significant." After receiving it in the fall, he confronted Merck lawyers about why he hadn't seen it earlier.
       In a letter to Waters in October, Merck attorneys said they had in fact made available 32 boxes of records, but that the copying service hired by the plaintiffs for some reason had failed to copy several of the boxes - including the one with the Hilleman memo.
       "The memo," said company spokeswoman Mary Elizabeth Blake, "was produced voluntarily by Merck in the ordinary course of discovery proceedings."
       Hilleman is a former senior vice president of Merck who developed numerous vaccines for the company. A 1999 profile in the Philadelphia Inquirer said that "it is no exaggeration to assert, as many scientists do, that Maurice Hilleman has saved more lives than any other living scientist."
       Hilleman, 85, currently director of the Merck Institute for Vaccinology, had officially retired and was a consultant to Merck when he wrote the '91 memo. He declined to be interviewed.
       The memo was sent to Dr. Gordon Douglas, then head of Merck's vaccine division and now a consultant for the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institutes of Health. Douglas also declined to comment.
       The memo stated that regulators in several countries had raised concerns about thimerosal, including in Sweden, where the chemical was being removed from vaccines.
       "The public awareness has been raised by the sequential wave of experiences in Sweden including mercury exposure from additives, fish, contaminated air, bird deaths from eating mercury-treated seed grains,dental amalgam leakage, mercury allergy, etc.," the memo said.
       It noted that Sweden had set a daily maximum allowance of mercury from fish of 30 micrograms for a 160-pound adult, roughly the same guideline used by the FDA. Adjusting for the body weight of infants, Hilleman calculated that babies who received their shots on schedule could get 87 times the
mercury allowance.
       The Swedish and FDA guidelines work out to about four-tenths of a microgram of mercury per kilogram of body weight. A stricter standard of one-tenth of a microgram per kilogram has been adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency and endorsed by the National Research Council.
       These standards are based on methyl mercury, the type found in fish and airborne emissions from power plants. Though toxic, the ethyl mercury in thimerosal may be less hazardous than methyl mercury, some scientists say, because it is more quickly purged from the body.
       "It appears essentially impossible, based on current information, to ascertain whether thimerosal in vaccines constitutes or does not constitute a significant addition to the normal daily input of mercury from diverse sources," the memo said.
       "It is reasonable to conclude" that it should be eliminated where possible, he said, "especially where use in infants and young children is anticipated."
       In the U.S., however, thimerosal continued to be added throughout the '90s to a number of widely used pediatric vaccines for hepatitis B, bacterial meningitis, diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus.
       It was added to multi-dose vials of vaccine to prevent contamination from repeated insertion of needles to extract the medicine. It was not needed in single-dose vials, but most doctors and clinics preferred to order vaccine in multi-dose containers because of the lower cost and easier
 storage.
       The Hilleman memo said that unlike regulators in Sweden and some other countries, "the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not have this concern for thimerosal."
       A turning point came in 1997 when Congress passed a bill ordering an FDA review of mercury ingredients in food and drugs.
       Completed in 1999, the review revealed the high level of mercury exposure from pediatric vaccines and raised a furor. In e-mails later  released at a congressional hearing, an FDA official said health
authorities could be criticized for "being 'asleep at the switch' for decades by allowing a potentially hazardous compound to remain in many childhood vaccines, and not forcing manufacturers to exclude it from new products."
       It would not have taken "rocket science" to add up the amount of exposure as the prescribed number of shots was increasing, one of the e-mails said.
       While asserting that there was no proof of harm, the U.S. Public Health Service in July 1999 called on manufacturers to go mercury-free by switching to single-dose vials. Soon after, Merck introduced a
mercury-free version of its hepatitis B vaccine, replacing the only thimerosal-containing vaccine it was still marketing at the time, a company spokesman said.
       By 2002, thimerosal had been eliminated or reduced to trace levels in nearly all childhood vaccines. One exception is the pediatric flu vaccine made by Aventis and still sold mainly in multi-dose vials.

 

 

Home How To in Your State Legislator Packet Legislative Text Press Releases Dental Ban Articles
 

CONTACT US:

MERCURY BAN Info 
state contacts/media inquiries!